Plucker: Gifted Education, Race & Poverty — How Do We Join Forces to Close America’s ‘Excellence Gap’?
Tucker Haynes: Proof That Charters Offer Excellence to All Children Goes Beyond U.S. News’s Top 10 Ranking
Avossa & Chang: As Immigrant School Leaders, We Know That No Immigrant Student Should Have to Live in Fear
Bradford — The Politics & Partisanship of America’s Education Reform Debate: A Growing Blue-Red Divide
Bradford — The Politics & Partisanship of America’s Education Reform Debate: Time for a Suburban Strategy?
Miles & Wiener: In Washington, D.C., a Road Map for Reinventing Professional Development in Schools
Analysis: From ‘Incarceration Pay’ to ‘Rule of 75,’ Surprising Contract Benefits for Teachers Union Staffers
DeGrow: New Detroit Supe Wants to Compete With Charter Schools. How He Can Start Raising the Bar
Lake: Why Personalized Learning Will Ultimately Live or Die on Its Ability to Manage Change
Bradford — The Politics & Partisanship of the Education Reform Debate: Why Being ‘Right’ Isn’t Enough
Rotherham: Why Won’t Betsy DeVos Answer Hard Questions?
Williams: When Students Own Their Academic Results, They Transform Their Schools
Fiddler: The Cost of Textbooks Is a Huge Obstacle for Poor Students. Here’s a Solution
Jeb Bush: What the Media Is Getting Wrong About Florida’s Push to Help Students With Disabilities
Bankert: If Rahm Emanuel’s Graduation Plan Is to Succeed, Colleges Must Lower Barriers for Poor, Minority Students
Student Voice: My Mother Is Undocumented. My Father Was Deported. I Am the Resistance
Murray: Why One Ohio English Teacher Was Wrong to Say Preparing Students for Work Was Not His Job
Dean Robert Pianta: Why Trump’s Policies Are a Threat to Role of Public Education in America
Analysis: A Brief Summary of the Bizarre (and Sometimes Funny) Things You Didn’t Know Were in Teacher Contracts
Fisher: For HS Grads, 21st-Century Thinking, Skills (and Robots) Can’t Replace Importance of Human Networks
Opinion: The NAACP Stumbles on Charter Schools
Photo Credit: Getty Images
September 25, 2016
Sign Up for Our Newsletter
The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People has ignited a firestorm with its latest challenge to charter schools. That shouldn’t come as a surprise: Public charters draw on a deep wellspring of support from black parents, especially those in working-class and poor urban neighborhoods.
A group of more than 160 black education leaders has sent the NAACP a letter urging its national board to reconsider a resolution calling for a moratorium on new charter schools. The signatories include Michael Lomax, president of the United Negro College Fund, and Geoffrey Canada, president of the acclaimed Harlem Children’s Zone.
(The 74 — Tucker Haynes: Dissent in the Black Community As Educators Hijack Platform, Turn on Schools)
But this is not a crusade limited to education titans. Regular folks — parents with limited incomes but big ambitions for their children — are also enthusiastic supporters of charter schools. That’s because those schools can offer an alternative to failing traditional schools for families without the resources to buy their way into better school districts or to pay for private institutions.
As Lakisha Young, a black Oakland, Calif., parent, put it in an op-ed she wrote for the East Bay Times:
“We received the moratorium demands from NAACP and [Black Lives Matter] with dismay and want to respond clearly to them: If your solution is simply to turn off the tap and ban new charter schools, then you do not speak for us.”
It’s a shame the NAACP is working against the interests of parents like Young. It’s the nation’s most respected civil rights organization, and its history is inextricably bound up with increasing educational opportunity for people of color.
But the organization has long been skeptical of charter schools, claiming that they drain resources from traditional institutions. At the NAACP’s national convention in July, delegates passed a proclamation that made several far-fetched claims about charter schools, including the absurd contention that they mimic the practices of mortgage lenders during the subprime crisis.
(The 74 — Much Attention on Upcoming NAACP Charter Vote, Even If It’s Just the Latest in a Long Line)
The truth is that the NAACP has bought into the arguments of the K-12 education establishment. Too many public school teachers and principals, many of them also NAACP members, see charter schools as unwelcome competition, a threat to their livelihood.
Charter schools are no panacea, but the most successful among them have boosted the academic achievement of children of color around the country.
As Stanford University’s Center for Research on Education Outcomes reported in its benchmark Urban Charter School Study: “The typical student in an urban charter school receives the equivalent of 40 additional days of learning growth … in math and 28 days of additional growth … in reading compared to their matched peers in [traditional public schools]...”
Those increases matter greatly in the lives of children who may now be afforded the opportunity for college.
The NAACP wants to slam the door on that chance for children of color to boost their academic achievement. That’s the wrong fight for an organization that has spent more than half a century fighting for black children to get a better education.