Bertelli: Why a Recent Drop in Charter School Support Is Not About Charter School Quality
Langhorne: When Pursuing Education Becomes a Crime, It’s the System That Should Be Scrutinized, Not the Students
Cunningham: The School Choice Debate Has Derailed. It’s Time to Focus on Parents’ Rights & Student Success
Exclusive: Teachers Union Document Reveals Master Plan for Unionizing Charter School Networks
Whitmire: In the State That Created High-Performing Charter Networks, College Success Is Lagging Behind Others
Rafal-Baer: In Education, Preparing Next Generation of Leaders Shouldn’t Be a Revolutionary Idea
Smith: 10 Lessons From Rocketship Education’s First Decade as a Pioneer of K-5 Personalized Learning
Oreopoulos: No Diploma Without a Plan for the Future? Why Chicago’s New Graduation Requirement Might Work
Williams: How a Tougher Test and Chaos in D.C. Just Made Things a Whole Lot Harder for Kids Learning English
Analysis: Teachers Union Adds 40,000 Offshore Members While Labor Rolls Stagnate at Home
Quality Early Learning Programs Are a Key to Future Success. Why Don’t States Put Them in Their ESSA Plans?
Bradford: A Free Education System Bought and Sold on the Housing Market, as It Was Intended to Be
Litt: Why Kids in Low-Performing Schools Are Set to Lose Big Under California’s Current ESSA Plan
Reality Check: Before Smartphones Ruined Teenagers, It Was Video Games! And TV! And Elvis!
Lake & Tuchman: Disability Rights Advocates Are Fighting the Wrong Fight on School Choice
Anello: Why the NAACP Should Look Beyond Misleading Narratives & Work With Charters to Lift Up Black Students
Analysis: How OER Is Boosting School Performance and Equity From the Suburbs to the Arctic
Analysis: Which Bothers Randi Weingarten More — Segregation or School Choice?
Howard Fuller: Advancement — the Second ‘A’ in NAACP — Should Apply to Our Children Too
Korman & Rotherham: You Can Help Schools and Social Service Agencies Collaborate Better for Students
Opinion: The NAACP Stumbles on Charter Schools
Photo Credit: Getty Images
September 25, 2016
Sign Up for Our Newsletter
The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People has ignited a firestorm with its latest challenge to charter schools. That shouldn’t come as a surprise: Public charters draw on a deep wellspring of support from black parents, especially those in working-class and poor urban neighborhoods.
A group of more than 160 black education leaders has sent the NAACP a letter urging its national board to reconsider a resolution calling for a moratorium on new charter schools. The signatories include Michael Lomax, president of the United Negro College Fund, and Geoffrey Canada, president of the acclaimed Harlem Children’s Zone.
(The 74 — Tucker Haynes: Dissent in the Black Community As Educators Hijack Platform, Turn on Schools)
But this is not a crusade limited to education titans. Regular folks — parents with limited incomes but big ambitions for their children — are also enthusiastic supporters of charter schools. That’s because those schools can offer an alternative to failing traditional schools for families without the resources to buy their way into better school districts or to pay for private institutions.
As Lakisha Young, a black Oakland, Calif., parent, put it in an op-ed she wrote for the East Bay Times:
“We received the moratorium demands from NAACP and [Black Lives Matter] with dismay and want to respond clearly to them: If your solution is simply to turn off the tap and ban new charter schools, then you do not speak for us.”
It’s a shame the NAACP is working against the interests of parents like Young. It’s the nation’s most respected civil rights organization, and its history is inextricably bound up with increasing educational opportunity for people of color.
But the organization has long been skeptical of charter schools, claiming that they drain resources from traditional institutions. At the NAACP’s national convention in July, delegates passed a proclamation that made several far-fetched claims about charter schools, including the absurd contention that they mimic the practices of mortgage lenders during the subprime crisis.
(The 74 — Much Attention on Upcoming NAACP Charter Vote, Even If It’s Just the Latest in a Long Line)
The truth is that the NAACP has bought into the arguments of the K-12 education establishment. Too many public school teachers and principals, many of them also NAACP members, see charter schools as unwelcome competition, a threat to their livelihood.
Charter schools are no panacea, but the most successful among them have boosted the academic achievement of children of color around the country.
As Stanford University’s Center for Research on Education Outcomes reported in its benchmark Urban Charter School Study: “The typical student in an urban charter school receives the equivalent of 40 additional days of learning growth … in math and 28 days of additional growth … in reading compared to their matched peers in [traditional public schools]...”
Those increases matter greatly in the lives of children who may now be afforded the opportunity for college.
The NAACP wants to slam the door on that chance for children of color to boost their academic achievement. That’s the wrong fight for an organization that has spent more than half a century fighting for black children to get a better education.