‘No One Is Above the Law’: Divisive Trump Surrogate Carl Paladino Removed From Buffalo School Board

Veto Override Uncertain as Fight Over Funding Illinois Schools Moves to the House

Noble Network of Charter Schools: It’s Not Just About Going to College, but About Global Perspective & Leaving Chicago

74 Interview: David Hardy on Putting Purpose Before Politics and Kids Before Adults in Leading Ohio’s 2nd State-Takeover District

For Schools, an Eclipse Conundrum: To Open or Close? For Fun or for Science?

New Poll Shows Sharp Decline in Support for Public Charter Schools Over Past Year

A Massachusetts Teachers Union Votes to Kill a Successful Charter School, as Families Scramble for Answers

WATCH: Mission to Mars Video Wins $10,000 and Visit to NASA for 4 NJ Middle Schoolers

Jason Botel Reportedly Out at Education Dept. as Feds Reject ESSA Plan From DeVos’s Home State

2 in 3 High School Students Know of Kids Who Cheat Using Digital Devices — but Few Admit Doing It Themselves

Call Her RoboKid: How a Cutting-Edge Robot Is Helping an Ohio Student Attend Classes While She’s Sick at Home

LearnLaunch Accelerator Gives a Boost to Ed Tech Startups Worldwide From Its Boston Home

No More School Daze? California Weighs Making Middle & High Schools Start Later So Students Can Sleep In

This Week in ESSA: Pennsylvania Looks to Cut Testing Time, Indiana Reformats A–F Grades & 3 More Approvals

What Our Kids Made at Summer Camp: Proud Parents Posting Adorable Photos of Arts & Crafts on Social Media

74 Interview: Michael Lomax, CEO of the United Negro College Fund, on Guiding Low-Income Students Through College

Los Angeles Schools Launch Campaign and Resource Guides to Protect Immigrant Students

300 Tutors, Working With Students 2 Hours a Day: One School Network’s Investment in Personalized Learning

Data Sharing, Data Dumping & Claims of ‘Academic Fraud’ in Tweetstorm Over Story About Louisiana Vouchers

As Congress Mulls Slashing $2B in Title II Funds, Educators See Cuts Devastating Critical School Leadership

Fewer Than 1 in 3 Americans Support Kids Opting out of Tests; About Half Confused on What ‘Opt Out’ Means

Photo Credit: Getty Images

August 13, 2017

Talking Points

Most have heard of the Opt Out movement, but many don’t actually understand it, @TeachersCollege survey reveals

Most think Opt Out movement is about opposing Common Core. But new survey shows that’s not the case

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

A majority of Americans are familiar with the opt-out movement — parents withdrawing their children from standardized tests — and nearly half of them oppose the practice, according to a new survey from Columbia University’s Teachers College. But even among the one-third who support opting out, many have misconceptions about the true goals behind it.

The movement, which gained national attention in 2015, first cropped up in New York as teachers and parents objected to what some saw as an increased emphasis on standardized testing and a reliance on exam scores in teacher evaluations. In 2016, 22 percent of grades 3–8 students didn’t take New York State’s standardized English and math exams, and resistance has spread across the country: from Baltimore to Albuquerque to Seattle, entire classes have walked out of schools to protest standardized testing.

Two-thirds of respondents to the survey said they had heard about the movement, and more than half said they understood its goals. However, 45 percent said they thought a top priority behind the opt-out movement was opposition to the Common Core, up from one-quarter in a similar study in 2016. In fact, the top concern activists list is opposition to standardized test performance being used for teacher evaluations.


 

This survey was also designed to test how politicized wording around the opt-out movement might affect respondents’ answers, especially compared with other national surveys that have used more neutral wording. The survey divided respondents into three distinct groups to test three different phrases: “excusing,” “opting out,” and “boycotting” standardized tests. However, the results found only a modest impact on support.

About 35 percent supported the movement when it was described as “boycotting,” compared with 31 percent who supported “opting out” and 29 percent who supported “excusing.” More respondents — 65 percent — had heard about parents “boycotting” or “opting out” of standardized tests than the 59 percent who had heard about parents “excusing” their children from exams.

“When we use the term ‘boycott,’ we are bringing back a meaning of the politics or the ethical concerns that activists have,” said researcher Oren Pizmony-Levy, assistant professor of international and comparative education studies at Teachers College. “That’s why the public is saying, ‘Oh, they’re not only just keeping the kids at home. They’re doing it for a political or ethical purpose.’”

This theory is backed up by a 2016 Education Next poll that found a quarter of respondents favored the opt-out movement when survey language gauged support for “letting parents decide.” But a 2016 Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup poll found 37 percent of respondents supported “allowing parents to excuse their child” — politically neutral language.

Responses remained consistent across race and socioeconomic backgrounds, but they did differ by gender. About 34 percent of women supported the opt-out movement, as compared with 29 percent of men.

This survey allowed respondents to state why they opposed or supported the opt-out movement. Answers usually hinged on the value people saw in standardized tests and which players in the education system — schools or parents — they think have the most expertise.

“I don’t believe that one test can measure a student’s learning,” wrote one respondent, identified as a 51-year-old American Indian/Alaskan Native female parent in Alabama. “The test may be biased toward certain races or genders. Also, some children have [test] anxiety and just do not test well. The student could also be having a bad day and not test well.”

But others found it “foolish” to opt out:

“I think it is wise to not exclude/opt out your child for standardize[d] testing, I believe it limits them,” wrote a 53-year-old white male parent in New York. “As well I would want to know how well my child does on these tests and not opt out and then later realize they had issues in math or reading.”

Still, many respondents didn’t take a side, and 85 percent said they were ambivalent about whether to support or oppose opting out.

“I don't really support or oppose,” wrote a 27-year-old white female non-parent in Colorado. “I do believe it is their right to make the choice, but I also understand what the point is for doing the tests.”

The nationwide survey was conducted online in English during February and May 2017 of  2,107 Americans age 18 and older. Participants were recruited through Amazon Mechanical Turk and Qualtrics Panels.