The New Reformers: City-Loving Millennials Who Want Quality Schools Not Tied to Their ZIP Code
Analysis: Hillary Clinton Is Right About Head Start
Opinion: The Promise of Multiple Education Pathways
Analysis: Now Critics, Unions Supported Build-Up of Police in Schools for Years
Opinion: New York Is Fixing Its Common Core Standards — and You Can Help
Opinion: The NAACP Stumbles on Charter Schools
Opinion: Sorting Out the Issues in the Teacher Shortage Crisis
Opinion: It’s Back-to-School Season. Do You Know Where Your Employees’ Kids Are?
Analysis: New Warnings of Teacher Shortage Sound Like Déjà Vu All Over Again
Analysis: 1 in 5 High Schoolers Is Chronically Absent. Here’s What Data Shows About Those Kids
Allison Robinson: Could Working Moms Be the True Winners of the Election?
Elliot Haspel: Michael Petrilli Misreads How Poverty Affects Learning
Analysis: Why More Than 2,000 Schools Are Now Offering Longer Days — and Longer School Years
Analysis: Unions Have Cash but Not Partners in Fight Against MA Charter Proposal
Jeanne Allen: What’s a School Choice Warrior to Do During This Political Campaign?
Analysis: CT Judge Issues Sweeping School Funding Ruling — a Call All States Should Heed
What Teachers and NFL Players Have in Common: Pension Problems
Tucker Haynes: Dissent in the Black Community as Educators Hijack NAACP Platform, Turn on Schools
Magee: For Schools, the Hardest Part of Establishing Higher Standards Is Over
Cami Anderson: School Reform 2.0 — Educational Excellence AND Equity
Myth of the Hero Teacher? What the New York Times Gets Wrong About Schools Overcoming Poverty
March 3, 2016
Sign Up for Our Newsletter
“The Myth of the Hero Teacher” is the New York Times’s most recent, melancholic meditation on the education profession. A review of Ed Boland’s new memoir, the piece considers the failure of a new teacher at an urban, low-income school.
According to the article, Boland entered the classroom fueled on “movies like Dangerous Minds and Stand and Deliver, in which heroic teachers reach into the lives of at-risk adolescents and make a difference.” He left feeling somewhat otherwise.
Sources are quoted. Experts are consulted. And, in the end, the piece gives us opportunity to consider the specter of poverty and the shadow it casts over education.
Fundamentally, the Times article is right. Too often we’ve settled on a mythology that a single teacher can turn the tide against poverty, and when that quixotic expectation falls short, we throw up our arms in defeat.
The message we all strangely accept: “Sorry, but this is too big. Go home. Save yourself the heartbreak.”
I think it’s time that the narrative in our country began a fundamental shift – away from “How is it possible to succeed amid all these challenges?” to “How is it possible to remain failing when there are so many good solutions?” I don’t care how stubborn poverty is — failing schools can never be an acceptable status quo.
So here’s another story the press hasn’t been quite so aggressive about covering. It’s about educators who — tired of the lone wolf Stand and Deliver mythology — decided to build something different, and to do it together.
Instead of a “sorry, but,” it’s a story of “yes, and.”
Did it take better training and support for teachers? Yes, and — a character-building discipline system? Yes, and — a curriculum that challenges students to think at the highest levels? Yes, and — regular follow-up with students even when they are in college? Yes and...I think you get the idea.
The thing is, there are schools out there right now — as you read this and as I write it — that are giving lie to the implication that school improvement needs to wait for the country to heal poverty.
We can’t wait, and we don’t have to.
Take the most recent PARCC exams in New Jersey. About 41% of the state’s 11th graders met or exceeded expectations on the test.
In Essex County, high-income Millburn High School (2.2% economically disadvantaged) saw 57% of students scoring proficient or advanced on the assessment. The juniors at Livingston High School (1.5 % economically disadvantaged) earned 56.5%.
A few miles away, the juniors at Newark-based North Star Academy (83.7% economically disadvantaged) earned an 80.6% pass rate.
The school achieved it through more systems and strategies than I could possibly recount here. The good news is that I don’t have to.
Uncommon Schools, which manages North Star, publishes books — and books and books – to share its practices. It regularly films teachers to “show” and not just “tell.” It opens its doors to hundreds of visitors every year. It runs professional development for external audiences and sells trainings so they can turn-key them locally.
And, there’s good evidence it’s working.
Of course, Uncommon doesn’t have all the answers, but it isn’t the only organization that is doing this. There are tons of other schools — charter and traditional and private — that are happy and eager to share best practices. We’re all in the business of helping kids.
And while teachers alone probably cannot make the change we need, teachers working together most definitely can.
Just ask Jaime Escalante.
Earlier in my career, I too watched Stand and Deliver and became curious about the famed educator. If he had some classroom magic, couldn’t I just replicate it in my room and see the same results?
It turns out that Escalante didn’t work solo miracles the way the film implies. Rather, he worked with a group of teachers and administrators to make change for his community. The lone wolf of education reform ran in a pack.
It’s about time we dropped the myth of the lone “hero teacher” along with the one that poverty is just too big a villain to confront.
There are plenty of heroes out there — they’re all working together to build rigorous, joyful schools for kids who deserve them. They are teachers and administrators and politicians and parents who are tired of waiting for change and have gone about the business of making it.
These kinds of heroes aren’t mythological. You don’t have to imagine what their victories look like.
Just ask and they’ll show you.
Flashcards Test Scores and Teacher Evals: A Complex Controversy Explained