The Seventy Four marks School Choice Week (Jan. 24-30) with a series of stories celebrating educational options and innovation. Read our coverage here.
(Brooklyn, New York) —
On a November morning at Hebrew Language Academy
, a public charter school in Brooklyn, a 5-year-old girl led a dozen kindergarten classmates in a “Simon says”-like game, telling them in Hebrew to touch various articles of clothing.
“Yadayim al ha chatzait,” the girl said at one point. “Put your hands on your skirt.”
“I don’t have one!” a little boy blurted out, also in Hebrew, to giggles all around.
“They can laugh in the language,” the school’s director of Hebrew instruction, Arleen Danon, pointed out to a visitor. “That’s big.”
Just three months before, Danon proudly noted, most of those children had not spoken a word of Hebrew.
Making the scene even more remarkable was something else: Both the girl leading the game and the boy without a skirt were African-American — as were several of their classmates. It turns out that the language of the Torah, in combination with school choice, can be a force for racial integration.
The academy’s overall enrollment, in fact, is 41 percent black, 53 percent white and 3 percent Latino, a far cry from the all-Jewish enclave that some skeptics foresaw when the school opened seven years ago.
Its three-year-old sister school, Harlem Hebrew Language Academy
is even more racially mixed at 42 percent black, 38 percent white and 20 percent Latino.
Both stand out as islands of integration in the New York City public school system, which a UCLA study identified two years ago as one of the most racially and economically divided in the country.
Their diversity is no accident, according to Jonathan Rosenberg, president of the Hebrew Charter School Center
,the parent organization of the two New York City schools and seven others around the country.
Principal David Penberg speaks with Hebrew Language Academy fifth-grader David Dvir
Rosenberg said organizers of Hebrew Language Academy put “a lot of sweat and work” into enrolling students of different backgrounds — and he argued that more charter schools should do the same.
“In New York City and New York state, we have grown so accustomed to egregious patterns of segregation that they’ve almost become part of the backdrop,” Rosenberg said.
Rosenberg, who said he does not speak Hebrew, is a former civil rights attorney for the U.S. Department of Education. He lives with his biracial wife and kids in
Montclair, New Jersey renowned for desegregating its schools through a system of “controlled choice.” (Read The Seventy Four’s takeout on Montclair’s school integration, its achievement gap and the political forces behind the district’s 2015 opt-out movement)
The melting pot myth
Sixty-two years after Brown vs. Board of Education, Rosenberg said he is dismayed that the formal segregation banned by the Supreme Court has been replaced by de facto segregation — driven by white flight, mortgage redlining, poverty-related housing patterns and arbitrary school district boundaries.
Most of New York’s charter schools, meanwhile, have focused on serving the students who need help most: black and Latino kids whose only other choice is a poor-performing district school. Their “no excuses” goal has been to demonstrate that children of color can succeed if given the right tools and attention, which has been borne out by the test scores of high-performing charters such as the Success Academy network.
A side effect of this approach is racial segregation. The 2014 report
by the UCLA Civil Rights Project found that 73 percent of New York City’s charter schools were less than 1 percent white, and 90 percent were less than 10 percent white. Only 8 percent had white enrollment at or above the citywide average of 14.5 percent.
“The key tension is between a desire to (direct) your limited resources to the students who need it most, versus a corollary desire to serve kids in an integrated context,” Rosenberg said. “If you believe integrated schools are good for low-income kids, you can’t achieve it by serving only low-income kids.”
At Hebrew Language Academy, diversity was a priority from the beginning, said founder Sara Berman, who is board chairwoman for both that school and the Hebrew Charter School Center.
“There is something so exciting about walking into our schools and seeing this diverse group of kids together, making life together in this environment,” Berman said. “They’re learning this is what America is — America is a melting pot, it’s a diverse country … This is what a public school can and should be.”
That most American schools are not melting pots was brought back to the nation’s attention by the 60
th anniversary of Brown vs. Board of Education in 2014. The UCLA study brought the issue painfully home for New York City. A recent two-part episode
of the public radio program “This American Life” made a compelling research-based case that integration is the surest way to equalize education for children of color.
Yet direct attempts to desegregate schools still struggle for traction, even in multi-ethnic and otherwise progressive places like New York. On the Upper West Side of Manhattan, for example, community opposition persuaded Mayor Bill de Blasio’s administration to drop a rezoning plan that would have shifted students from a mostly white elementary school to a nearby school that is mostly black and Latino — and identified as “persistently dangerous.”
meanwhile, the city is moving cautiously forward with another racially charged rezoning in the face of resistance from parents of all colors. (Read The Seventy Four’s opinion piece on why New Yorkers should favor diversity in their schools, not just their neighborhoods.)
Charters have the advantage of being schools of choice. They don’t order families to enroll, they persuade them to. Plus, as James Merriman of the New York City Charter School Center
points out, charters are not wedded to any particular neighborhood or ethnic group. If the demographics shift, people are less likely to resent being “taken over.” “Charters can provide a place that is no man’s land, so to speak,” Merriman said.
This is where Hebrew Language Academy came in.
Taking a page from the Greeks
The city already had many dual-language charter or magnet schools for Chinese, Russian, Korean, Arabic, Greek and other languages. Many were among the city’s more multi-ethnic schools. Berman said her father — financier-turned-philanthropist Michael Steinhardt — and other like-minded donors set out to establish something similar for Hebrew.
As she studied how to make that goal a reality, she said she was particularly inspired by a tour of the Hellenic Classical Charter School
in Brooklyn, which has emphasized Greek language, food and culture, yet enrolled a substantial number of African-American and Latino children along with those of Greek heritage.
“It was just this perfectly wonderful, warm diverse, normal public school,” she recalled. “I was excited about teaching Hebrew to all American kids.”
Berman and the other organizers then faced the usual challenges of starting a charter in New York City — especially in finding suitable real estate — with the further complication of recruiting a diverse student body.
Working to their advantage was the broad appeal of charters for black and Latino families, who tend to live in neighborhoods with poor-performing district schools, and the uniqueness of the theme. “I had a feeling that in New York City a lot of families would be interested in a first-rate school that taught Hebrew,” Berman said.
That proved correct in the case of Noellene Foresythe, an immigrant from Trinidad who was eager to keep her son Jayden out of the neighborhood district school, which had a reputation for fighting. As she scouted for an alternative, Hebrew Language Academy caught her attention.
“When they said they were teaching Hebrew, I said, ‘Wow, that’s a different language. You don’t ever get that,’” Foresythe recalled. She enrolled Jayden in kindergarten, and said he has thrived there to the point that he skipped third grade. “When we’re driving around and he sees the (Hebrew) writing, he will tell us what it says.”
To maximize the variety of families who would enter their admission lottery, HLA organizers chose to locate in Community School District 22, a section of Brooklyn with a mix of immigrants from Russia, Israel, the Caribbean and the Philippines along with African Americans and Latinos, said Shane Goldstein Smith, the Hebrew Charter School Center’s executive director for the New York region.
Organizers also did a lot of recruitment at community groups, houses of worship, nursery schools and even nail salons and fruit stores in what Berman called “a very concerted effort to reach out to everyone and say, ‘This is a school for you.’”
The result has been what Principal David Penberg calls an “incredible mix of ethnicities, cultural backgrounds, socio-economic backgrounds. It’s a real opportunity to get it right with regard to diversity.”
Organizers ran into community opposition when they sought to co-locate in an existing district school — a not-uncommon experience for charters — and eventually chose instead to use leased space for several years before renovating a building of their own.
Students at the Hebrew Language Academy
Academically, Hebrew Language Academy has had its struggles. It received an “F” on its report card from the New York City Department of Education in 2013, its fourth year of operation. City officials said the school’s test results were above average, but had not shown enough improvement from year to year.
The test scores have since strengthened. Today, under revised standards implemented by de Blasio’s administration, the school is rated “good” or “excellent” in all categories, including academic performance.
For the 2014-15 school year,
42 percent of its students passed their state English tests, and 64 percent passed in math, substantially beating the averages for District 22 and the city as a whole.
On the waterfront
The academy occupies a waterfront building in an otherwise industrial section of Mill Basin. The renovated warehouse is roomy and pleasant and still has a slight smell of fresh paint.
As Penberg, the principal, led a visitor on a tour, a student greeted him with “Hi, Dr. P!” and asked when they could have lunch. “I let the kids have lunch with me,” he said afterward. “They can sit at the table where the adults sit. … It’s better than locking yourself in an office and being the place where folks go for discipline.”
Under the school’s immersive approach to language instruction, students receive a period of formal Hebrew lessons each day, and several of their other classes are conducted in both English and Hebrew, with one teacher speaking each. Hebrew instructors also preside at meals.
During one language lesson, students clustered on the floor in semicircles around instructors who led them in speaking, reading and writing exercises, using nothing but Hebrew. Rather than simply asking students to call out the name of an object or conjugate a verb, they wove words and concepts into a flowing dialogue with students.
“We’re imitating the process of first language acquisition,” said Danon, the Hebrew instruction director. “We don’t want to say, ‘What is this? This is a pencil.’ Rather: ‘Pick up the blue pencil.’”
Often, the teachers use worksheets and other materials they have designed and made themselves, because most of the commercially available Hebrew-language materials have too much religious content to be appropriate in a public school.
Whether playing games or doing exercises, the students appeared thoroughly engaged to the point that they scarcely seemed to notice adult visitors coming in and out of their classroom. Nor was a word of English heard.
Like most charter schools, Hebrew Language Academy relied heavily on philanthropic support at the start. Now in its seventh year, the school operates almost entirely on government funding, primarily the $13,877 per pupil it receives from the city under the state charter school law. Berman said that amounts to 70 percent to 80 percent of the per-pupil funding for nearby district schools.
Asked how she affords the extra staffing needed for Hebrew instruction, Berman answered: “I would flip it on its head and say that the district schools need to do the explaining as to what they’re doing with the money.”
Culture clash, not really
Her academies are not alone in harnessing the flexibility of charter schools to promote racial integration. The National Coalition of Diverse Charter Schools
, founded in 2014, has dozens of members in 12 states and the District of Columbia. Rosenberg, the president of the Hebrew Charter School Center, is a founding member of the coalition’s board.
Another member, Century Foundation fellow Halley Potter, noted that the first proponent of charter schools — the United Federation of Teachers founding president, Albert Shanker — had meant for them to be teacher-run and draw students from across a region instead of a single district. “In that original idea, student diversity was built in,” she said.
Charter leaders later drifted from Shanker’s vision — leading him to repudiate the movement — but Potter said she welcomes the renewed focus on diversity.
“It has been an exciting year for school integration issues,” Potter said. “There has been so much more conversation over the last year than there has been for many years prior to that.”
Standing in the way of more progress for diversity-oriented charter schools, Rosenberg warned, is a state law mandating that charter enrollments closely match the economic makeup of their home school districts. That rule effectively bars charters based in poor districts from trying to bring in wealthier white families. Rosenberg said the law is well-meaning, but should be made more flexible.
The value of the dual-language approach used by Hebrew Language Academy and other culturally themed schools was confirmed by a recent study out of Portland, Ore. The study
by RAND Corporation and the American Councils for International Study found that students randomly assigned to dual-language programs gained an extra nine months’ worth of reading ability by eighth grade.
Harder to quantify are the long-term benefits of learning and socializing with kids of different races and classes.
“What’s amazing to me is how little culture clash there is and how wonderfully normal and conflict-free the schools are,” Berman said. “It just gives you the greatest sense of optimism and hope that children really are color-blind and, if put into the right environment, are so excited to learn about each other’s culture and backgrounds.”
Berman recalled an African-American student at Hebrew Language Academy whose family home was destroyed in a fire.
“The city was going to provide housing so far away that the child was no longer going to be able to attend HLA,” she said. But then a white family from the school with access to an empty apartment offered it to the family who had lost theirs.
“As I tell this story years later, I have the chills,” Berman said. “Because those are relationships that wouldn’t have been built otherwise.”