Antonucci: Can Nevada’s Teachers Union Survive?

Whitmire: Charter Leaders Saw Too Much Damage to Students (and Their Own Future) to Embrace Trump’s Budget

Opinion: New California Accountability Dashboard Provides Little Light for Poor Families

Bradford: Why Nikole Hannah-Jones’s Faith in Public Schools Loses Sight of Some Harsher Truths

Lake: At Last, a Court Says Kids (Like Mine) With IEPs Deserve a Top Education. But More Fights Loom Ahead

Cami Anderson: The Left-Right School Discipline Debate Misses the Point. We Need a Third Way

Arons: 3 Reasons New York Was Right to Drop Its Teacher Literacy Test

Analysis: Are NYSUT’s Finances a ‘Ponzi Scheme’? Former Financial Analyst Sounds the Alarm

Stewart: Charter Advocates Must Not Forget the First Commandment of Politics — It’s All About Your Base

Drucker: Time to Stop Misrepresenting Charter Gains on Special Education

Cook: Charter Activists Know How to Walk the Walk but Not How to Talk the Talk

Bradford: Charter Schools’ Best Allies May Be the Parents Who Don’t Know Anything About Them — Yet

Tucker Haynes: Racist Taunts at Robotics Champs Go Deeper Than Trump Immigrant-Bashing

Petruzzi: As ESSA Scales Down Federal Oversight, Educators & Local Leaders Must Rise to the Challenge

Marchitello: Why Betsy DeVos Could Be a Boon for Progressive Education Advocates

State Sen. Van Taylor: Why Texas Should Kill Taxpayer Pensions for Teachers Who Victimize Children

Opinion: Teachers in an Opportunity Culture: Well-Paid, Powerful, and Accountable

Analysis: Internal Documents Show Few Union Members Volunteered for Massachusetts Anti-Charter Campaign

Williams: Lord, What Fools These Ed Reformers Be! A Requiem for the Every Student Succeeds Act

Gonzales — Education After the ESSA Rollback: What States Can Do Now to Lead the Charge on School Equity

Campbell Brown and Kevin P. Chavous: Teachers Unions Strong-Arm Democrats, Kill Iowa Education Summit

October 8, 2015

Kevin P. Chavous
Kevin  P. Chavous

Kevin P. Chavous is a founding board member for the American Federation for Children. He is a former member of the Council of the District of Columbia and a former chairman of D.C.’s Education Committee. Chavous was responsible for enacting numerous education reforms in D.C. Chavous is chair emeritus of the Democrats for Education Reform and a former chair of the Black Alliance for Educational Options.

Kevin P. Chavous is a founding board member for the American Federation for Children. He is a former member of the Council of the District of Columbia and a former chairman of D.C.’s Education Committee. Chavous was responsible for enacting numerous education reforms in D.C. Chavous is chair emeritus of the Democrats for Education Reform and a former chair of the Black Alliance for Educational Options.

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

This post originally appeared in The Daily Beast
Recently, while speaking at a public high school in Des Moines, IowaPresident Barack Obama criticized political correctness and those who not only refuse to hear opposing views, but go so far as to silence opposing points of view:
“I’ve heard of some college campuses where they don’t want to have a guest speaker who is too conservative, or they don’t want to read a book if it had language that is offensive to African Americans or somehow sends a demeaning signal towards women. I’ve got to tell you, I don’t agree with that either—that you when you become students at colleges, you have to be coddled and protected from different points of view. Anybody who comes to speak to you and you disagree with, you should have an argument with them, but you shouldn’t silence them by saying you can’t come because I’m too sensitive to hear what you have to say.”

While his message was directed at college students, the message is really universal. While the protection of speech is at the bedrock of our democracy, it’s critical as a nation that we exercise our right every day—and that includes embracing and engaging with those we may not agree with.

Incidentally, while President Obama’s message may have resonated with the high school students sitting in the gymnasium, it falls on deaf ears with the nation’s largest teachers union.

Recently, The Seventy Four and the American Federation for Children teamed up to hold forums focused on our nation’s education system. The first forum was held in New Hampshire and featured six of the leading Republican presidential candidates—all of whom sat for 45 minutes to speak in depth on education issues facing our nation. The events were unscripted, live, open to the public and forced candidates to talk policy specifics and not in soundbites.

A second forum was to be held in Iowa and feature Democratic candidates for president. In addition to The Seventy Four and the American Federation for Children, the two organizations teamed up with The Des Moines Register, one of the nation’s most-respected newspapers.

Unfortunately, this event will not take place, as POLITICO reported, the nation’s two largest teachers unions, the National Education Association (NEA) and the American Federation for Teachers (AFT), worked aggressively behind the scenes to kill the event.

Rather than risk having Democratic candidates speak about education reform, perhaps celebrate the teachers unions' positions or perhaps break with the teachers unions (both the NEA and AFT have endorsed Secretary Clinton), the unions maneuvered behind the scenes to actively discourage candidates from participating.

This form of bullying is anti-democratic. It diminishes the free engagement of ideas—just as the President said, with those you agree with but perhaps equally important, with those you disagree with.

The teachers unions active attempt to undercut an event sponsored by two organizations dedicated to education reform and a highly respected newspaper perhaps says more about the AFT’s and NEA’s weakness than their strength.

Voters have demonstrated time and again that candidates who buck the teachers union are rewarded. The NEA and AFT oppose empowering parents, they oppose charter schools, oppose common sense tenure reform that would protect good teachers and remove ineffective teachers, and they sue to stop parents from accessing school choice programs.  Meanwhile, voters strongly support all of these issues which is why in 2014, despite spending an estimated $100 million, the NEA and AFT were largely seen as the biggest losers of the election cycle. In nearly all parts of the country, voters rebuked the teachers unions’ message and backed reform-minded candidates.

The evidence is more than anecdotal. In a national poll conducted by Beck Research, a Democratic pollster who has previously done work for the NEA, 60 percent of Democrats favored the concept of school choice. Furthermore, 63 percent of voters supported private school choice, when they were specifically asked if they support or oppose “opportunity scholarships, also known as school vouchers.”

Perhaps there is no greater evidence that the teachers union has swung too far out of the mainstream that they both have been a target of near-constant criticism from Secretary of Education Arne Duncan.

In the end, while the NEA and AFT may claim a momentary victory by silencing discussion and debate on education reform, ultimately they will continue to lose the battle with public opinion. More and more parents and voters have rejected the teachers union antiquated, top-down, one-size-fits-all approach to education, and continue to elect candidates who embrace reform that celebrates students and empowers parents.