Cook: Pettiness Blocks Progress in Louisiana, as Governor Vetoes Common Sense Education Bill

Analysis: How the California Teachers Union Is Spending Its Summer

Simpson: When Teachers Act as Coaches, Everyone Comes Out a Winner

Ladner: ‘Frontier Justice’ From Parents at ‘Wild West’ Charter Schools Yields Great Results for Students

Cantor: Falling in Love Again (With School Policy) Binge-Watching ‘The West Wing’

Weisberg: Paying Teachers Not to Teach Is Absurd — but Reviving NYC’s ‘Dance of the Lemons’ Hurts Kids

Richmond: Autonomy or Accountability? Good Charter School Authorizing Means Balancing the Two

Union Report: The Sad Triviality of the National Education Association’s Annual Conference

Lieberman: ESSA Allows States to Focus on Often Overlooked Pre-K Ed Players — School Principals

Analysis: Ed Tech Decision Makers Are Under Pressure in Higher Education

Irvin & Gray — Reforming the Way We Govern Schools: Stronger Charter Boards Are Essential to Education Reform

Antonucci: NEA’s New Charter Schools Policy Isn’t New, Just Matches Union’s Long-Held Action Plan

Arnett: Schools Will Be the Beneficiaries, Not the Victims, of K-12 ‘Disruptive Innovation’

Boser and Baffour: Making School Integration Work for the 21st Century

Williams: Raising LA High School Graduation Rates by Any Means Necessary Is an Empty Accomplishment

Rice: Charter Schools Are Advancing the Cause of Black Education in America for the 21st Century

Slover: Remembering Mitchell Chester, the ‘Johnny Appleseed’ of U.S. Education Policy

Hernandez: Career and Technical Education Is Valuable for All Students — Not Just the Ones Who Bypass College

Union Report: After 19 Memorable Years, My Farewell to the Annual National Education Association Convention

Riccards — Beyond Growth and Proficiency Lies Mastery: DeVos and the Crowning of Competence as King

Arons: 3 Reasons New York Was Right to Drop Its Teacher Literacy Test

March 23, 2017

Elizabeth Arons
Elizabeth Arons

Elizabeth Arons is CEO of the Urban Schools Human Capital Academy.

Elizabeth Arons is CEO of the Urban Schools Human Capital Academy.
Talking Points

NY’s ending the teacher literacy test is actually good policy

NY’s teacher literacy test was not associated with better teaching or student gains

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

In a controversial decision, the New York State Department of Education last week removed the Academic Literacy Skills Test as a prerequisite to teacher certification. But before joining the cries that NYSED is “lowering standards,” let’s step back and look at the move in context.
Three major issues suggest themselves:
First, giving literacy tests to prospective teachers who graduated college shows that the state does not trust colleges and universities, including its own, to ensure that graduates are literate. The prospective teachers theoretically just spent four years or more demonstrating literacy skills. Are any other professionals required to take a literacy test after spending four years passing college courses that demand reading comprehension and writing skills? Is their college transcript merely a decoration?
Second, unless I am missing research associated with the test, it’s not clear that passing it correlates to greater productivity in student achievement once one is in the classroom as a teacher. Designing certification hoops for prospective teachers to jump through may make legislators and educators feel more responsible, but few if any of these hoops predict the teacher’s ability to improve student achievement.
Third, and most important, piling on certification requirements without changing any of the other educational levers (better pay for high performers, differentiated pay for critical shortage fields, strong supports for classroom teachers, etc.) only serves to strangle the pipeline that leads to teaching. Schools of Education and alternative pipelines (like Teach for America) are down 15–20 percent from past years, which is typical of what happens in a strengthening economy when careers other than teaching (with its nine-month salary) provide strong competition (with 12-month salaries).
School districts cannot compete on that playing field. Even affluent suburban districts struggle to find sufficient quality applicants; in critical shortage fields like math and science, the situation is desperate, with vacancies open all year.
So kudos to New York State for questioning the value of certification barriers that show little connection to actual classroom performance. In fact, what we should be discussing is national reciprocity for teachers with licensure portability. Who’s in?